
Issue #15
I'm dating myself here, and I'm okay with that.
Back in the day, before Columbia House was just Columbia, the famous music label, there was this unbelievable deal that took every music lover by storm. Ten CDs for one cent. Any genre you wanted, you just couldn't pick two of the same album from the same artist. A penny. For ten.
It was wild! Everyone was doing it. Multiple times, if you could get away with it.
The assumption was that after your ten-CD haul, you'd settle in and pay full price like a good customer. Back in the day, my brother and I β and most everyone I knew β would cancel the second the introductory period ended, then sign right back up.
Different address.
Different name.
A middle name here, a different last name altogether there.
It's how most people grew their CD collection. The more CDs, the better. Going to a friend's house and seeing towers of CDs was like gold. A dance party every time you came to visit.
Here's the part I didn't think about until much later: we all knew exactly what we were doing.
We understood the deal well enough to beat it. We read the structure, the commitment, the markup, the auto-shipments, and went, nope, not falling for that part, just the penny part, thanks. The fine print wasn't fine print to us. It was the whole game, and we played it.

So what happened? When did we go from outsmarting the catch to not even reading it?
The Penny Was Never The Point.
Columbia House wasn't lying. That's the thing people forget. It really was a penny. Ten CDs, one cent, no asterisk that made the penny a lie.
The trick was never the offer. It was the structure underneath the offer.
The mechanism even has a name (as usual): negative option billing. Translation β your silence counts as a yes. You don't agree to the next shipment; you get charged for it unless you remember to say no. The penny got you in the door. The contract is where the product actually lived.
The math was beautiful for the behemoth music company.
Letβs break this down. A "free" disc cost Columbia House around $1.50. A full-priced CD, the ones your contract committed you to, ran them maybe $3-5 to produce, but sold to you for $16.99. Even if only 1 in 3 discs sold at full price, they came out ahead. At their peak, Columbia House and its rival BMG were pulling in around a billion and a half a year.
The penny was the marketing budget. The fine print was the business.
Here's my favorite detail: the people who worked there had all run the fake-name scam themselves before they got hired. It was an inside joke. The company knew.
They'd literally budgeted for this scenario of what they were selling, a built-in percentage of fraud, not big enough to matter. My brother and I weren't beating the system. We were the system, accounted for on a spreadsheet, line item: kids will cheat, let them.
The big type said a penny. The fine print said we'll get it back, and then some, even though we already know you'll try not to let us.
Take a quick break and check out my Sponsor, Go-To-Millions. Content for Marketers.
Your Boss Will Think Youβre an Ecom Genius
Youβre optimizing for growth. You need ecom tactics that actually work. Not mushy strategies.
Go-to-Millions is the ecommerce growth newsletter from Ari Murray, packed with tactical insights, smart creative, and marketing that drives revenue.
Every issue is built for operators: clear, punchy, and grounded in whatβs working, from product strategy to paid media to conversion lifts.
Subscribe free and get your next growth unlock delivered weekly.
Same Trick, Fewer Stamps.
Fast forward. The fine print didn't go away. It just stopped needing paper.
Tell me if these sound familiar: the subscription that takes one tap to start and a scavenger hunt to end. The free trial that's really a free-then-pay conversion, where the card on file was the entire point. The "membership" you can sign up for on your phone in the bathroom, but you have to cancel by calling a number that's only staffed during the exact hours you're at work.
This got so out of hand that the government tried to legislate the obvious. The Federal Trade Commissionβs fix had a name so plain it's almost funny: the Click-to-Cancel rule. The whole idea was that leaving should be as easy as joining. Think about what it says that someone had to make that a law.
The FTC was fielding nearly seventy complaints a day about this stuff, up from forty-two just three years earlier. And then? A federal court struck the rule down in the summer of 2025 on a technicality. The structure outlived the law designed to kill it. The fine print won that round.
Columbia House at least made you find a stamp and invent a fake name to escape. Now you just need to find the cancel button, the one engineered, on purpose, to hide from you.
The Fine Print Became The Screen.
Thereβs an updated version of this that should genuinely give you pause, because the fine print has now climbed inside the device and is watching you back.
Most newer TVs run something called ACR, automated content recognition. Basically, your television takes a snapshot of whatever's on its screen, roughly twice every second, and logs it. Everything. Shows, yes, but also the security camera feed you cast, the vacation photos off your phone, whatever's coming through that HDMI cable.
Texas sued five of the biggest TV makers over this at the end of 2025: Sony, Samsung, LG, Hisense and TCL. And the complaint reads like the Columbia House contract grew up and got a user interface redesign.
Look at the asymmetry. To turn this on, Samsung gave you one button at setup: I Agree to all. One click. To turn it off? More than fifteen clicks, buried across menus inside menus. That's the penny-to-get-in, fake-name-to-get-out math, except now it's literally the interface. One click to say yes. A labyrinth to say no.
Electronics giant LG named this by using some very creative language. They called their tracking program the "Viewing Information Agreement." Sit with that for a moment. It's a phrase engineered to slide right past you, to sound like housekeeping, to be technically honest and functionally invisible. It tells you nothing about a TV screenshotting your living room twice a second. The euphemism is the fine print now.
The attorney general called it a "surveillance-by-default design philosophy." Privacy folks have a sharper name: consent theater. The appearance of a choice, without the substance of one. Look it up. Again, a real thing used in marketing.
For what it's worth, Samsung and LG have since settled and agreed to use actual pop-up disclosures and a real opt-out. So sometimes the structure gets dragged into the daylight. Just not on its own.
The Line.
The catch was never hidden. Not at Columbia House, not in the cancel flow, not on the setup screen. It was right there the whole time, in the contract, in the terms, in the agreement with the friendly name. We could read it. We used to.
The companies didn't get more honest over the years. The penny is still a penny. The trial is still free. The agreement is still, technically, an agreement. Every word is true. That's what makes it work.
What changed is us. Paper became a click, became a glowing button, and somewhere in there we got tired. We stopped beating the catch because we stopped looking for it.
They outlasted us.
Until Next Wednesday,
~Aliya



